|
|

| |
 |
|
 |
 |
August
17th, 2004
THE
GREATEST MOTION PICTURE NEVER MADE
by
Eric 'Renderking' Fisk
Best
Motion Picture Never Made
I’m
green with envy.
I admit when I’m jealous or when I envy someone
or something.
It’s odd that I would feel jealous or left out
for a movie. Worst yet, I’m upset for a sequel that
hasn’t been made yet.
A sure sign that maybe I might need to get a
life, just like some sports fans need to get over the
fact that their home team might never win a pennant
or World Series.
When
I look at a lot of the "making of" or "the
art of" books for the Star
Wars movies, I get pretty darn frustrated.
Why can't Lucas and company put this much energy and
creativity into making the next Jones flick? There are some fantastic environments and vehicles in the Star
Wars Universe; a lot I wish could be adapted
for the Jones era.
How cool would it be for Jones to fight a former
student now adversary in the proximity of a lava pit?
Or a chase with planes flying through New York
City (however that might be in bad taste in a post-September
11th world). Or
to see our hero in a life and death struggle against
mechanical walkers in the arctic?
No matter how you cut it, all of that would be
pretty cool
With all the energy and
focus that’s been given to the prequel trilogy, I wish
some of that would spill over to the next sequel to
Raiders of
the Lost Ark.
Right now, I have to live vicariously and
get my satisfaction elsewhere from movies such as Road
To Perdition, Hidalgo,
Hellboy
(how can you not like a demon fighting for the side
of God against evil forces and supernatural Nazi’s ghouls?)
and the upcoming Sky
Captain and The World of Tomorrow.
Yet all of these movies are mere appetizers for
the main course, which is being cooked up by the chefs
at the Lucasfilm™ kitchen. |
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
 |
Gold
Mine
I’ve
been saying that for the past month on various forums,
the Fourth Disk in the Jones Box Set is a gold mine
of Information about Indiana Jones 4.
The most important bits of information about
Indy 4 can be found in the Making of Raiders
featurette.
Spielberg
and Lucas talk about the genre of the Indiana Jones
films or the genre of films that inspired it.
The Raiders films are obviously there
to pay homage to the movies made back in the era that
it takes place in, i.e. the 1930’s and 1940’s.
Mr. Spielberg talks about how the Raiders
movies have always meant to be the antithesis of the
other types of movies they’ve done such as Star
Wars and Close
Encounters.
Mr. Spielberg even mentioned that he and George
agreed that there would never be anything remotely extra-terrestrial
in these movies.
(Just not in so many words.)
Everything
they say in The Makings of Raiders dictates the
intention for the whole series.
Much of what they say over and over again leads
me to believe that Indiana Jones 4 won’t be that
much different from Raiders, and that there won’t
be a huge departure.
Indy 4 will be a variation on the same
theme. Even
the way they film it will be much the same according
to Spielberg in an interview with Premiere Magazine
about 10 months back when the Indiana
Jones DVDs were released.
Also, there were a
lot of ideas that they came up with for Raiders
that just couldn’t fit in the movie, so many ideas that
they had left over were used in the two other films.
There are a ton of things they could do with
the character of Indiana Jones regardless of his age,
endless themes about artifacts and locations.
As it has always been, it’s just a matter of
writing the right script and then just getting it done.
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
 |
The
Dark Horse that’s been missing all this time.
A few months
ago in a Star
Wars comic there was an Indiana Jones crossover
that told the “what if” story about Han Solo and Chewbacca
getting lost and crash landing on an “alien” world.
Centuries later the wreck of the Millennium Falcon was
found by our hero archeologist who was in hunt for “Big
Foot”.
The issue sold
out, I couldn’t find it anywhere here in the New England
area and I had to rely on people sending me scans of
it so I could see what I was missing. I admit
it was very well drawn and written. But, on the
other side we were given something very briefly and
then taken away just as quickly.
Dark Horse
has several Star
Wars titles, but there in no current one
for Indiana Jones. There have been a few done in the
past but the back issues are almost impossible to find
here in the North East. (If you run a comic book shop
and have a few complete collections, drop us a line
at info@theindyexperience.com.)
Since the ones that have already been done by Dark Horse
in the past are so hard to find, you would think there
would be a market for reprints and an on-going series.
Even the one done by Marvel Comics back in the 1980s
is in slight demand, although I didn’t like it as much
as I enjoyed what I saw of the Dark Horse brand.
Dark Horse Comics should have an Indiana Jones
title, if only quarterly (4 times a year). It’s
something that would satisfy the fans AND bring in huge
revenues for the publisher. Just as the next movie
is limited only the imaginations of the creators, there
are endless things that could be done in the comics such
as illustrating what Jones did between the time of The
Last Crusade and what he did during World War II.
(History shows us that many scientists doubled as spies
in Europe, going in the region to do “research” while
at the same time keeping tabs on the enemy’s movements.)
There are many fans well into there 30’s and 40’s who
would subscribe to this title, no doubt.
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
 |
Returning
Characters And Cameo’s?
Through
out the past few years we’ve heard and read countless
rumors that in the next installment there will be many
brief appearances of characters from the previous three
movies. For
the most part, I’m apprehensive.
I would like nothing more for those who are working
on the next film to concentrate more on the actual script
and the plot than contrive something to just showcase
the actors and actresses who have been in the other
Jones films before.
We
would all like to see what other characters have been
up to since we last saw them.
What has Marion been up to and how come she isn’t
with our hero anymore?
How about Short Round and Willie Scott, how did
they turn out after the trek home?
What other adventures has Sallah had with Dr.
Jones? And
how has finding the Grail changed Indy’s father in the
long run, and has he retired from teaching Medieval
literature? Good
questions but do any of them make for a good story that
would equal the original Raiders
of the Lost Ark?
I only want to see
a return of these characters that we’ve all loved to
come back if their return can be woven into the story,
not to just plop them in for a few minutes of screen
time. The
best scenes with all of these characters have something
in common; they’re actually DOING something to help
the plot forward.
That’s how Jones 4 should be, characters
moving the action and the story forward and not just
a virtual waving into the camera. |
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
 |
Leaving
The Soap By The Sink
This
is a subject that has me pulling my hair out on many
of the fan forums.
Many of the fans (mostly women) want to see Jones
have to “deal” with having a kid, one that he didn’t
know about as if this series of action films is some
kind of high violence soap opera.
Which leads me to say "leave the soap by
the sink".
The
“family” thread was played out in the The Last Crusade 15 years ago. Many would argue that it didn’t help the action along but added
more suspense and drama.
Making the quest of the artifact more personal
wouldn’t seem to fit within the world of Indiana Jones
if it went on for much longer.
The
situation would be even worse if Jones had to “deal”
with a kid he hardly knew about or one that was a complete
surprise to him. If a kid shows up, how many pages of the Indiana Jones 4
script would be spent on this issue?
And that would result in fewer pages of action
and the plot revolving around the artifact he would
be after.
Like
it or lump it, our hero Indiana Jones is a role model
for many young men such as myself when I was a teenager.
Kids are already getting bad messages about parenthood
that it’s OK to have children out of wedlock and let
the state welfare system take care of them.
If Jones is going to have a kid, it should be
done in such a way to send a more positive message than
what kids are getting in schools and in the media.
It doesn’t take a village to raise a child; it
takes a stable intact family.
I
also don’t want to see the “Disney Factor”, the fresh
face of the month or the latest graduate from The
Mickey Mouse Club (Britney, Christian, Justin, Hillary...)
as a cute child star to bring younger kids into the
theater. Fact
is, I really don’t want to see younger kids in the theater
if there are going to be faces melting, heads exploding,
hearts ripped out or villains being driven off a cliff
or turned to dust from drinking from the false Grail.
Get it?
No cute kids.
The only kids I want to see are college students,
Jones being the “Abner Ravenwood” for a protégé; and
if Indy happens to have a daughter who he’s raised since
the day she was born and falls in love with this favorite
student of Indy’s then the circle would be complete.
In essence Jones would have become the man he
once looked up to.
But let’s lay off the melodrama, ok? |
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
 |
Indiana
Jones 4
as Film Noir
One
of the ideas that I’ve been trying to promote on the
web is the notion that Indiana Jones 4 could
or should have an element of film noir.
Question is; what is film noir and how do I define
it in such away as to fit the adventures of Indiana
Jones? Typically,
I see film noir as it’s already been defined in this
thread as dark, pessimistic disillusionment, disenchantment,
and to quote a fellow fan who said it best; “Film
noir shows the dark and inhumane side of human nature
with cynicism and doomed love, and they emphasize the
brutal, unhealthy, seamy, shadowy, dark and sadistic
sides of the human experience.”
I’m
a huge fan of the genre of film noir because of its
style and how, during its peak, it featured the styles
and sensibilities of the era in which the Indiana Jones
films took place.
I’ve been saying for a long time that Jones
4 should be darker than Last
Crusade but not to the extent of Temple
Of Doom.
More of a return full-circle to
Raiders of the Lost Ark.
With the exception of Short Round (fingers crossed
that he returns as an adult) and Sallah, Jones should
feel alone and wonder if he’s become a relic.
And to keep within the film noir formula while
maintaining the character of Indiana Jones, we should
see that Jones is the same man of integrity and strength,
while it’s the rest of the world that’s changed to the
point that he’s been left behind as the world is divided
into two camps, Communism and Capitalism.
Also,
there should be some scenes that reflect the style of
filming that’s made film noir famous… the fog-filled
city streets at night.
Perfect elements and environment for a fedora-clad
hero consumed with a plot of intrigue and suspense.
Maybe Jones shouldn’t go too far into the world
of mystery like most film noir movies, but just enough
to satisfy our appetites. |
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
 |
The
Raiders Connection
The
hardest part now for fans of Indiana Jones is to read
about all the other projects that Mr. Lucas and Mr.
Spielberg are working on.
Just as Aaron has written earlier, “Uncle Steven”
is now working on a new version of War of the Worlds while
“Uncle George” is in Post Production with Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge Of The Sith.
On the one hand, we are almost guaranteed at
least TWO good adventure flicks in the near future while
on the other hand it seems we have that much longer
to wait for the fourth Indiana
Jones film. The most we can hope for is that
the creative energy they're pouring into these other
projects will spill over into IJ4.
What
I desperately want to see is how we say good-bye to
our beloved character. It’s
my hopes that we leave him the way we found him. I
picture the second to last scene is Jones being toasted
during his retirement party with many of his friends
from the previous movies in attendance (many of the
other actors there dressed in different costumes than
before as ‘different characters’.) At
the end of the toast, he says to the crowd: “Thank you
so much, I’m done with adventures. I’m going to retire for good and maybe write a few text books,
then call it a life.”
His companions would ask: “Done, you mean for
good?” Jones
replies: “You heard me, I’m home and I’m done for good.”
With
a hard cut, you see Jones once again in the jungle wearing
the signature fedora and jacket, turning back to his
companions: “Ok, so I lied.”
Then, we see Jones with a map in hand moving
deeper into the jungle, and he becomes the mysterious
character he was when we first saw him in the opening
scene of Raiders of the Lost Ark, an enigmatic man walking through the
shadows of the jungle. We
see him come to a curtain of vines, moving them aside
then aside to reveal the entrance of yet another temple.
He steps
into the darkness with his companions as The Raiders
March sets in just as the end credits begin to roll.
The
most important role this next movie should play is to
give fans something more to cling to, bring the character
back to the iconic hero we loved in the first motion picture
and leave him in such a way that we know there are other
adventures to be left to the imagination of the audience.
Have
an opinion? Want to ask questions, or comment
on this week's column? Email Mr. Fisk him self
at renderking@theindyexperience.com. |
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
|